Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat!: bump bignum to v0.5.0 #30

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 20, 2025
Merged

feat!: bump bignum to v0.5.0 #30

merged 6 commits into from
Jan 20, 2025

Conversation

TomAFrench
Copy link
Member

Description

Problem*

Resolves #29

Summary*

This PR updates to the latest release of noir-bignum

Additional Context

PR Checklist*

  • I have tested the changes locally.
  • I have formatted the changes with Prettier and/or cargo fmt on default settings.

@TomAFrench TomAFrench changed the title feat: bump bignum to v0.5.0 feat!: bump bignum to v0.5.0 Jan 16, 2025
@TomAFrench
Copy link
Member Author

@kashbrti this is actually ready for review now.

@@ -456,7 +458,7 @@ unconstrained fn compute_and_print_offset_generators<Fq, Curve, let K: u32, let
cofactor: Field,
)
where
Fq: BigNumTrait + std::ops::Mul + std::ops::Add + std::cmp::Eq,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change has happened in many places. wondering why we're not getting warnings about the std traits not being in scope?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We're using the fully qualified name for these traits here so there's no need to import them.

Copy link
Contributor

@kashbrti kashbrti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

other than the question I aked it all looks good

@TomAFrench TomAFrench merged commit 8b88fb7 into main Jan 20, 2025
7 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Jan 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: ✅ Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Tests fail on latest Nargo nightly release
3 participants